With organizations like Bank of America publicly stating that they have an unlimited budget to fight cybercrime, it no surprise in the recent Cybersecurity Market Report by Cybersecurity Ventures they are predicting worldwide spending on cybersecurity to exceed $1 trillion from 2017 to 2021.
With so many innovations in security technology, how will organizations prioritize their spending in 2017?
Read on and cast your vote on the tools you will be tapping in 2017.
There are multiple reasons that organizations are rethinking their InfoSec budgets:
Altogether, cyberattacks are expected to cost businesses over $2 trillion by 2019.
Not every organization has the revenue to support an unlimited security budget. With so many new security solutions on the market today and such a diverse of threats to defend against, it can be difficult to determine how to best allocate the money they do have.
In a recent survey, the SAN Institute found that the protection of sensitive data, regulatory compliance and reducing incidents and breaches were the main factors driving security spending in 2016. While that may not seem all that shocking, the breakdown of technology spending provides key insights into how companies hope to achieve those goals:
Interestingly, the companies that participated in this survey identified access and authentication and advanced malware protection as top “big wins” in terms of return on investment.
Regardless of which devices and monitoring tools you plan to purchase in 2017, they will all perform better when they are connected via a network TAP – a purpose built hardware device that ensures that each security appliance deployed sees 100% of the bits, bytes and packets in the traffic streams they are supposed to be analyzing.
Too often security teams rely on open ports on their network switches (SPAN ports) to feed data to their perimeter defense tools (next-gen firewalls, IDS, anti-malware solutions, etc.) This may seem like a good idea, however, the minute that traffic volumes spikes, network switches prioritize their primary functions and then fail to send the data to their connected devices. Clearly, this is a vulnerability that no company can afford.
When budgeting for security projects in 2017, simply add 5% to your project plan to eliminate visibility risks with dedicated network TAP. Once installed, network TAPs can support additional security appliances and monitoring tools without any loss of traffic data.

Are you content to make those investments without ensuring their ability to deliver against expectations?
If you need tips for maximizing ROI on your 2017 InfoSec budget, read our white paper: Planned Visibility: Network Architecture Tips for Supporting Security and Monitoring Tools from the Start.
If the inline security tool goes off-line, the TAP will bypass the tool and automatically keep the link flowing. The Bypass TAP does this by sending heartbeat packets to the inline security tool. As long as the inline security tool is on-line, the heartbeat packets will be returned to the TAP, and the link traffic will continue to flow through the inline security tool.
If the heartbeat packets are not returned to the TAP (indicating that the inline security tool has gone off-line), the TAP will automatically 'bypass' the inline security tool and keep the link traffic flowing. The TAP also removes the heartbeat packets before sending the network traffic back onto the critical link.
While the TAP is in bypass mode, it continues to send heartbeat packets out to the inline security tool so that once the tool is back on-line, it will begin returning the heartbeat packets back to the TAP indicating that the tool is ready to go back to work. The TAP will then direct the network traffic back through the inline security tool along with the heartbeat packets placing the tool back inline.
Some of you may have noticed a flaw in the logic behind this solution! You say, “What if the TAP should fail because it is also in-line? Then the link will also fail!” The TAP would now be considered a point of failure. That is a good catch – but in our blog on Bypass vs. Failsafe, I explained that if a TAP were to fail or lose power, it must provide failsafe protection to the link it is attached to. So our network TAP will go into Failsafe mode keeping the link flowing.
Single point of failure: a risk to an IT network if one part of the system brings down a larger part of the entire system.
Heartbeat packet: a soft detection technology that monitors the health of inline appliances. Read the heartbeat packet blog here.
Critical link: the connection between two or more network devices or appliances that if the connection fails then the network is disrupted.