<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=2975524&amp;fmt=gif">
BLOG

A Glimmer of Hope for Industrial Security in 2016

August 9, 2016

Creating the smart grid for critical infrastructure is becoming increasingly feasible from an economic standpoint.

For the oil and gas industry this could mean greatly-reduced operating costs and more efficient fuel consumption.

For utilities companies, the smart grid brings the ability to offer more demand-based pricing and efficiency benefits. However, security concerns have rightfully stood in the way of a seamless shift to the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).  

As we write this article, breaking news is being released on new malware targeting utilitiy companies in Europe.

But, despite the usual bleak outlook on Industrial Ethernet security, PwC’s recent report, The Global State of Information Security Survey 2016, offers a glimmer of hope for power and utility organizations regarding critical infrastructure security. Here’s what you need to know.

Threat Highlights from PwC’s The Global State of Information Security Survey 2016 for Power and Utilities 

There’s no denying the challenges that internet connectivity presents for power and utility companies, which is why PwC’s report begins by presenting their findings on today’s threat landscape:

  • 62% increase in the number of compromised utility customer records between 2014 and 2015
  • The increase in compromised records comes as detected security incidents dropped 34%
  • Attacks on patents and other hard intellectual property grew 234% year over year
  • The average cost of an industrial security incident nearly doubled, up 95% from 2014 

These four highlights paint the typically dark picture that surrounds Industrial Ethernet security. While the actual numbers may be surprising, the trends shouldn’t be anything new for security professionals within these power and utility companies. Defending Industrial Ethernet Network Security Garland TechnologyHowever, many OT security professionals have their hands tied when trying to adapt to modern IT practices. Modern security solutions aren’t tailored to the specific needs of Industrial Ethernet users, leaving security professionals with unpatched operating systems and legacy SCADA systems that can’t meet IIoT demands.  

These Industrial Ethernet challenges, coupled with the growing threat landscape, would seem to indicate that greater struggles are in store for power and utility organizations throughout 2016. However, if you look closely at PwC’s findings, you’ll see there’s a glimmer of hope for the state of Industrial Ethernet security in 2016. 

Why There’s Reason to be Cautiously Optimistic for Industrial Ethernet Security’s Future

Companies like Rhebo are pioneering new ways to defend the Industrial Ethernet, but power and utility companies can’t rely on any perfect, all-in-one solution to solve growing security challenges. 

Having said that, there were a few findings in PwC’s report that indicate these critical infrastructure industries are moving in the right direction when it comes to defending the Industrial Ethernet:

  • For the third year in a row, power and utility organizations raised their security budgets—this year by 9%
  • 55% of survey respondents are using Big Data to increase awareness of security incidents
  • 95% of respondents have implemented a risk-based security framework
  • External collaboration regarding cyber security best practices grew over 88% from 2014
  • The number of companies participating in industry/government information sharing more than doubled

It may seem counterintuitive to collaborate with your competitors, but when it comes to defending against increasingly sophisticated cyber attackers, information sharing is a necessity. This is why there’s hope for Industrial Ethernet security moving forward—power and utility organizations are taking steps toward securing new systems and working together to change the typically bleak narrative.

PwC’s report provides context for the growing concern for improving Industrial Ethernet security, but you’re still left wondering what practical steps you can take to defend IoT-enabled critical infrastructure.

If you want to learn more about how to actually protect your network as attackers increasingly target critical infrastructure, download our free white paper, Defending the Industrial Ethernet.

See Everything. Secure Everything.

Contact us now to secure and optimized your network operations

Heartbeats Packets Inside the Bypass TAP

If the inline security tool goes off-line, the TAP will bypass the tool and automatically keep the link flowing. The Bypass TAP does this by sending heartbeat packets to the inline security tool. As long as the inline security tool is on-line, the heartbeat packets will be returned to the TAP, and the link traffic will continue to flow through the inline security tool.

If the heartbeat packets are not returned to the TAP (indicating that the inline security tool has gone off-line), the TAP will automatically 'bypass' the inline security tool and keep the link traffic flowing. The TAP also removes the heartbeat packets before sending the network traffic back onto the critical link.

While the TAP is in bypass mode, it continues to send heartbeat packets out to the inline security tool so that once the tool is back on-line, it will begin returning the heartbeat packets back to the TAP indicating that the tool is ready to go back to work. The TAP will then direct the network traffic back through the inline security tool along with the heartbeat packets placing the tool back inline.

Some of you may have noticed a flaw in the logic behind this solution!  You say, “What if the TAP should fail because it is also in-line? Then the link will also fail!” The TAP would now be considered a point of failure. That is a good catch – but in our blog on Bypass vs. Failsafe, I explained that if a TAP were to fail or lose power, it must provide failsafe protection to the link it is attached to. So our network TAP will go into Failsafe mode keeping the link flowing.

Glossary

  1. Single point of failure: a risk to an IT network if one part of the system brings down a larger part of the entire system.

  2. Heartbeat packet: a soft detection technology that monitors the health of inline appliances. Read the heartbeat packet blog here.

  3. Critical link: the connection between two or more network devices or appliances that if the connection fails then the network is disrupted.

NETWORK MANAGEMENT | THE 101 SERIES