<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=2975524&amp;fmt=gif">
BLOG

Industrial Ethernet Basics—What the Convergence of IT and OT Really Means

October 25, 2016

Industrial Network Security Garland Technology NetworkTAPs Network Monitoring

In previous blogs about the Industrial Ethernet, we’ve touched on the growing internet connectivity of traditionally offline systems and what that has meant for security. For some, the context of Industrial Ethernet security concerns can get lost in the mix of news articles surfacing regarding critical infrastructure cyber attacks.

To better understand why industrial control systems (ICS) are more vulnerable than ever, we have to take a step back and look at how the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has emerged—through the convergence of information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT). 

 

Everyone Knows IT, but What About OT?

For decades, IT and OT have been separated by a corporate firewall to maintain the integrity of an IT organization focused on business transformation and an OT side concerned with physical production.

Unlike the IT side, which manages the software that drives most corporate functions like finance, HR and sales, OT manages physical pumps, motors, and other equipment in industries like manufacturing or oil and gas. Because of the differences in managing IT and OT, there is a staff training and experience gap between the two.

Employees on the IT side have been undergoing constant change for 30 or 40 years in an attempt to implement the latest technology for greater business value. However, someone working on the OT side (for example, a PLC operator) could operate the same system with the same skills for decades at a time.

Until recently, the static nature of OT employment hasn’t made a difference in the organization as a whole. However, the rise of the IIoT and the need for greater OT connectivity is driving IT-OT convergence.

>> Learn why SPAN Ports should not be used in industrial security solutions

The Convergence of IT and OT Is Creating Industrial Ethernet Security Concerns

According to Greg Gorbach, VP of ARC, “information tech is almost a distraction” for the OT side. This mindset has kept OT from embracing new waves of technology as the production process for critical infrastructure and manufacturing remained static and secure. However, the new benefits of IoT-enabled industrial processes are impossible to ignore:

  • Widen the scope of SCADA to look at the efficiency of every industrial asset across the entire facility and remote sites.
  • Real-time insight into predictive failure of business-critical systems
  • Gather data with affordable sensors and use big data analytics to yield actionable insight into specific performance metrics
  • IoT sensors can increase OT efficiency quickly—one company saw a 271% 20-year annualized ROI from IIoT monitoring.

These benefits are driving the convergence of IT and OT, where IT-developed technology is incorporated into ICSs. OT groups that have never thought about potential cyber threats are now forced to address strict Industrial Ethernet security demands despite a lack of experience with new systems and software.

IT-OT convergence isn’t just a trend—it’s a reality that all OT groups must face. The days of multi-year cycles between system updates are over and security is changing as a result.

Defending the Industrial Ethernet in the Wake of Digital Transformation

The convergence of IT and OT points to a larger movement in the business world—digital transformation. More than half of the companies that were on the Fortune 500 list in 2000 are no longer on the list and one of the biggest factors is a failure to adjust to emerging technology.

Industrial companies used to be able to ignore these kinds of statistics. However, IT-OT convergence has changed things for the future. Addressing security concerns is of the utmost importance for companies working with critical infrastructure—but these companies are often unprepared to deal with today’s security threats.

Looking to add a visibility solution to your industrial deployment, but not sure where to start? Join us for a brief network Design-IT consultation or demo. No obligation - it’s what we love to do.

Full Duplex Capture in Industrial Network Security Garland Technology

See Everything. Secure Everything.

Contact us now to secure and optimized your network operations

Heartbeats Packets Inside the Bypass TAP

If the inline security tool goes off-line, the TAP will bypass the tool and automatically keep the link flowing. The Bypass TAP does this by sending heartbeat packets to the inline security tool. As long as the inline security tool is on-line, the heartbeat packets will be returned to the TAP, and the link traffic will continue to flow through the inline security tool.

If the heartbeat packets are not returned to the TAP (indicating that the inline security tool has gone off-line), the TAP will automatically 'bypass' the inline security tool and keep the link traffic flowing. The TAP also removes the heartbeat packets before sending the network traffic back onto the critical link.

While the TAP is in bypass mode, it continues to send heartbeat packets out to the inline security tool so that once the tool is back on-line, it will begin returning the heartbeat packets back to the TAP indicating that the tool is ready to go back to work. The TAP will then direct the network traffic back through the inline security tool along with the heartbeat packets placing the tool back inline.

Some of you may have noticed a flaw in the logic behind this solution!  You say, “What if the TAP should fail because it is also in-line? Then the link will also fail!” The TAP would now be considered a point of failure. That is a good catch – but in our blog on Bypass vs. Failsafe, I explained that if a TAP were to fail or lose power, it must provide failsafe protection to the link it is attached to. So our network TAP will go into Failsafe mode keeping the link flowing.

Glossary

  1. Single point of failure: a risk to an IT network if one part of the system brings down a larger part of the entire system.

  2. Heartbeat packet: a soft detection technology that monitors the health of inline appliances. Read the heartbeat packet blog here.

  3. Critical link: the connection between two or more network devices or appliances that if the connection fails then the network is disrupted.

NETWORK MANAGEMENT | THE 101 SERIES