<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=2975524&amp;fmt=gif">
BLOG

Looking at the Ukraine Power Grid Hack: Why Defending the Industrial Ethernet Is No Longer a Precautionary Tale

February 2, 2016

When we discussed Rhebo’s innovative approach to Germany’s new IT-Security Act (ITSA), real-world cyber attacks on the industrial Ethernet hadn’t truly come to fruition. It seemed like a critical infrastructure hack was still relegated to the over-blown plot lines of Bruce Willis’ Live Free or Die Hard.

Even as countries like Germany take proactive measures against industrial Ethernet threats, cyber attackers manage to find ways to stay ahead of the game.

As 2015 drew to a close, the world experienced its first true critical infrastructure hack—an attack on Ukraine’s power grid.  

 

Putting the Ukraine Power Grid Hack in Perspective

We watch John McClane do his Die Hard job against a sophisticated set of critical infrastructure attacks and know it’s not real—especially when a car is launched in the air to take down a helicopter. But who knew how perceptive the 2007 film would be? 

The Ukraine power grid hack is truly a watershed moment in the history of cyber attacks. This kind of attack is so unique and new to the cyber security community that security researchers are debating whether squirrels or hackers are more dangerous to critical infrastructures (hint: squirrels cause far more power outages than hackers!).

The December 23, 2015 attack could mark the beginning of the increasing vulnerability of critical infrastructures on a global scale. While intelligence agencies and the US Department of Homeland Security are still investigating the hack, it’s important for every networking and security professional to understand what we know so far.

 

>> Download Now: Full Duplex Capture In Industrial Environments [Free Whitepaper]

 

The Details of the Ukraine Power Grid Attack that We Know So Far

It was first reported that half of one Ukrainian region lost power inexplicably. However, Slovakian infosec firm, ESET, discovered that several energy companies were targeted simultaneously. The full picture of details regarding the Ukraine power grid attack is unclear for now. But for those trying to defend the industrial Ethernet, it’s important to understand the two key attack vectors used in the hack:

  • BlackEnergy Trojan: According to Kaspersky Labs researchers, the BlackEnergy Trojan “is crimeware turned APT tool and is used in significant geopolitical operations…An even more interesting part of the BlackEnergy story is the relatively unknown custom plugin capabilities to attack ARM and MIPS platforms, scripts for Cisco network devices, destructive plugins, a certificate stealer and more.” 
  • KillDisk Malware: BlackEnergy is threatening on its own, but researchers have discovered the Trojan is acting as a back door to deliver the KillDisk malware. KillDisk is a data deletion attack vector capable of deleting upwards of 4,000 different file types while also containing scripts that specifically threaten critical infrastructures.

We know that industrial network traffic is heavily regulated and that introducing foreign packets is absolutely prohibited—which is why these pieces of malware are so dangerous. Defending your industrial Ethernet from advanced malware requires a true visibility plane. 

 

Passive Visibility Is the Key to Defending the Industrial Ethernet

Many cyber security measures have not been developed specifically for industrial Ethernet environments. Now that there is real-world example of an industrial Ethernet hack, it’s time for the industry to innovate and protect our critical infrastructures. The solution might seem to be a litany of active in-line security appliances throughout the network—but the network traffic restrictions make this an unfeasible approach.

Passive network TAPs are essential to industrial Ethernet connectivity because they are purpose-built, un-hackable and capable of enabling network monitoring without affecting traffic flow. According to Chris Sistrunk, TAPs are a great way to gain visibility into a network, both to look for evil, but to also detect misconfigurations and devices with firmware problems. Chris writes in detail in his, It's a TAP blog about the 4 Considerations when installing a TAP in ICS.

 

With passive network TAPs and the innovative solutions they are developing for the industrial Ethernet, companies can work towards defending themselves from a critical infrastructure attack like the one in Ukraine. 

 

Full Duplex Capture in Industrial Network Security Garland Technology

See Everything. Secure Everything.

Contact us now to secure and optimized your network operations

Heartbeats Packets Inside the Bypass TAP

If the inline security tool goes off-line, the TAP will bypass the tool and automatically keep the link flowing. The Bypass TAP does this by sending heartbeat packets to the inline security tool. As long as the inline security tool is on-line, the heartbeat packets will be returned to the TAP, and the link traffic will continue to flow through the inline security tool.

If the heartbeat packets are not returned to the TAP (indicating that the inline security tool has gone off-line), the TAP will automatically 'bypass' the inline security tool and keep the link traffic flowing. The TAP also removes the heartbeat packets before sending the network traffic back onto the critical link.

While the TAP is in bypass mode, it continues to send heartbeat packets out to the inline security tool so that once the tool is back on-line, it will begin returning the heartbeat packets back to the TAP indicating that the tool is ready to go back to work. The TAP will then direct the network traffic back through the inline security tool along with the heartbeat packets placing the tool back inline.

Some of you may have noticed a flaw in the logic behind this solution!  You say, “What if the TAP should fail because it is also in-line? Then the link will also fail!” The TAP would now be considered a point of failure. That is a good catch – but in our blog on Bypass vs. Failsafe, I explained that if a TAP were to fail or lose power, it must provide failsafe protection to the link it is attached to. So our network TAP will go into Failsafe mode keeping the link flowing.

Glossary

  1. Single point of failure: a risk to an IT network if one part of the system brings down a larger part of the entire system.

  2. Heartbeat packet: a soft detection technology that monitors the health of inline appliances. Read the heartbeat packet blog here.

  3. Critical link: the connection between two or more network devices or appliances that if the connection fails then the network is disrupted.

NETWORK MANAGEMENT | THE 101 SERIES