Garland Technology ensures complete packet visibility by delivering a full platform of network TAP (test access point), inline bypass and packet broker products.
Garland Technology is committed to educating the benefits of having a strong foundation of network visibility and access. By providing this insight we protect the security of data across your network and beyond.
Garland Technology's resource library offers free use of white papers, eBooks, use cases, infographics, data sheets, video demos and more.
The TAP into Technology blog provides the latest news and insights on network access and visibility, including: network security, network monitoring and appliance connectivity and guest blogs from Industry experts and technology partners
Our extensive technology partnership ecosystem solves critical problems when it comes to network security, monitoring, application analysis, forensics and packet inspection.
Garland Technology is dedicated to high standards in quality and reliability, while delivering the greatest economical solutions for enterprise, service providers, and government agencies worldwide.
Whether you are ready to make a network TAP your foundation of visibility or just have questions, please contact us. Ask us about the Garland Difference!
No matter which side you stand on, we can all agree that 2016 was an unusually crazy election year. Aside from the actual politics, this was the first time we spent all year talking about election hacking.
But we can’t just relax now that the election is over. Russian election hacking is only just starting!
After successfully disrupting the U.S. election, Russian hackers are setting their sights on Germany’s 2017 election. There’s still time for Europe to learn from America’s cybersecurity struggles.
Germany’s election hacking threats are similar to how the U.S. situation got started. In May 2015, the German Parliament network was hacked and it took the country’s intelligence agency over a year to identify Russian attackers as responsible.
This inability to detect intrusions is a real threat to the upcoming election! So much so that Hans-Georg Massen, head of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, has publicly explained there is growing evidence of Russian attempts to influence 2017 campaigns.
While the persistent 2015 hack was ultimately mitigated, a recent cyber attack has refueled concerns over Russian interference. In late November 2016, nearly 1 million Germans lost internet and phone access in an attack similar to the major U.S. internet outage in October.
The attackers attempted to add routers to a botnet, which would let them launch future attacks using the routers as remote-controlled infrastructure—a perfect foothold for upcoming election hacks.
This botnet attack seems to have failed, but we’ve seen how easy it is for attackers to evade detection and German intelligence leaders are understandably concerned. As we move into 2017, these leaders must get out ahead of Russian hacking groups.
It’s official—every U.S. intelligence agency agrees with confidence that cyber attacks related to the election were Russian attempts to implement a propaganda machine. Knowing the international implications, the CIA, FBI and NSA recently released a report warning European countries about Russian hacking group strategies and intentions.
Here are a few of the lessons to learn from the report:
These are just 3 of the takeaways from the report, but one thing is clear. We need to detect these attacks faster!
Unless you catch "hackers" in the act, it is very hard to determine who was doing the hacking. Why wasn't this brought up before election?— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2016
Don’t get caught up in this idea that if you suffer an attack, you have no chance of figuring out who launched it. That’s flat out wrong!
The best write up on this subject by far is by Peter Stephenson, Technology Editor of SC Magazine in his, "Of Course it was the Russians." blog.
"This is a forensic process. The forensic process is born out of two things: the first is the scientific method and the second is Locard's transfer principle. The scientific method tells us to create a hypothesis and attempt to falsify, or disprove it. Locard tells us that if two things touch they each leave something of themselves behind. Both of these principles apply to the Grizzly Steppe analysis. Because the hackers with whom we deal routinely are quite clever we need to expect such things as obfuscation, false trails, and attempts to derail an effort at attribution. The solution is data – lots and lots of data."
It seems like firewalls and active, in-line blocking tools get all the cybersecurity glory. But what about computer forensics? We know that hackers (especially skilled state-sponsored ones) are more than capable of slipping past cybersecurity solutions—you need computer forensics to avoid dangerous persistence.
With the right architecture of network TAPs, in-line security appliances, and out-of-band solutions like computer forensics, we can make sure that Russian hackers don’t get deep into our networks to steal valuable propaganda material. We know exactly how to identify hackers even if they aren’t “in the act.” We just need to get more efficient at it.
If you want to learn more about ensuring maximum visibility to get rid of persistent attackers, download our free white paper, Maximizing Visibility in Security and Monitoring Tools.
As the Senior Technology Consultant & Chief Editor at LoveMyTool, Tim O’Neill has over 45 years of technology experience at data/voice and video networking analysis companies, including successful senior roles in Sales, Product Design, Marketing Management, Business Development and Security.